Hosted By
This study draws on the theory of cognitive dissonance to better understand how individuals make moral sense of responsible business behavior in a societal paradox characterized by interdependent and contradictory demands between important social objectives. Using a qualitative survey open to the U.S. public at the the start of the pandemic, the study proposes a typology called the 4R Model of Moral Sensemaking of Competing Social Problems. The 4R Model offers insights for businesses on how their responses to competing social problems may be perceived as either responsible and/or irresponsible. The study then expands the paradox and micro-CSR literatures.
This article explores the contribution of psychological entrepreneurial support, based on same-gender group mentoring, to the strengthening of female entrepreneurial intention in the specific...
De nombreuses innovations échouent faute d’adoption et disparaissent rapidement, mais certaines, comme l’hydrogène vert ou décarboné, n’ont jamais réussi à s’imposer en 25 ans,...
La responsabilité sociétale des organisations se diffuse à l’ensemble des entités, privées comme publiques. Cette situation conduit aujourd’hui les associations loi 1901 à également...
